Skip to content Skip to navigation
Home > Blog > Tag > Debt Collectors
Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-07-11 2:03 pm

There has been an increasing amount of litigation brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). As a result, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is being called upon more often to address the complex questions that arise from applying this analog statute to the digital world.


Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-07-07 2:38 pm

Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) companies are prohibited from sending automated text messages to mobile phones without receiving permission first. This can become an issue when a cellular phone number has been recycled. When this occurs, the original user of that phone number may have given their permission to be called or text messages to be sent, however the new user may not have.


Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-06-19 2:23 pm

There has been an increase in the amount of litigation under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). This is likely due to an increase in the use of marketing to mobile phones. Since there has been a growth of technologies that easily reach smartphone users, compliance has become difficult since the rules are increasingly complex and unclear.


Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-06-16 2:56 pm

The meaning of "called party" under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) has not always been understood by telemarketers and debt collectors. In 2012, the Seventh Circuit, finally addressed the meaning of the term


Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-06-09 4:26 pm

Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) calls made to cell phones using automatic dialing systems or a prerecorded voice without the prior express consent of the party called are prohibited. However, if prior express consent is given, it can be revoked at any time provided it is revoked in a proper manner. How prior can be revoked varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.


Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-05-26 12:49 pm
More guidance has been provided on how courts define “express consent” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) with regards to debt collection. In the case Sharp v. Allied Interstate Inc., a federal district court in New York relied on earlier Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rulings that found that consumers had given their prior express consent in situations where they had given their respective contact telephone numbers to creditors in transactions that resulted in debts.

Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-05-19 12:01 pm
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) was enacted in 1991 to address the telemarketing practices that were perceived to threaten consumer privacy and public safety. The TCPA restricts telemarketing calls and the use of automatic dialing systems, artificial or prerecorded voice messages, and fax machines.

Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-05-09 12:45 pm
Consumers who have debt in default have probably received many calls from debt collectors wanting them to make payments. Consumers are protected from abusive collection practices under the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act (FDCPA). However, the FDCPA protections do not apply to a consumer’s original creditor.

Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-05-06 11:49 am
There are many reported cases where attorney fees and costs have been awarded to plaintiffs who have been successful in their Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) cases. However, attorney fees and costs awarded to defendant debt collectors who have had to defend a case made in bad faith or with the purpose of harassing the defendant are much less common.

Adam J Krohn / Posted: 2014-04-17 11:46 am
Debtors are protected from the harassment by debt collectors under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). If a debt collector has contacted you and has violated the FDCPA, a debtor can sue the debt collector in court. If a FDCPA lawsuit is successful, there are a range of damages provided for under the statute, including monetary damages and attorney’s fees.

Pages

Submit Your Details for Free Case Review